A safety case the TAA can sign
The MAA does not want a folder of reports. It wants an argument that this air system is acceptably safe, and the evidence underneath it. CertProve builds both from your programme
What this regime costs you today
Each article is reissued on its own clock. Cite one without its issue and you are quoting text that moved.
The regulation moves under you
Every Regulatory Article is reissued on its own timetable. Your last submission may already quote text that has changed.
A folder is not a case
Reports prove things. Somebody still has to argue why the whole air system is acceptably safe, and defend it.
The hazard log outlives the team
It is read years later by people who were not in the room when the risk was accepted.
Two authorities, one aircraft
The design side recommends and the TAA releases. Each wants a different document, built from the same truth.
Whatever you fly, it has to be proven
The MRP reaches every UK military air system, and what it carries
- Combat air
- Air transport
- Air to air refuelling
- Airborne surveillance
- Attack helicopter
- Maritime helicopter
- Support helicopter
- Remotely piloted
- Small uncrewed
- Weapons and stores
What changes when the evidence derives itself
Cite what is in force
Every article is named at the issue it is on, read from the file the MAA publishes.
Argue it, do not just file it
The safety argument is a structured claim, and an unsupported branch is shown as unsupported.
Keep the log readable
Hazards, their acceptance and who accepted them, held together rather than scattered.
Produce both documents
The certificate of design and the release to service recommendation, from one set of evidence.