Today a programme buys people, filing cabinets, or fluent guesses
Four ways to get a certification case across the line. Only one of them computes it
| The question | Consultancies | Document tools | General AI | CertProve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The whole case in one place | partly | no | no | yes |
| Tells you what a change broke | partly | no | no | yes |
| Answers in seconds | no | no | yes | yes |
| Every answer traced to the rule | partly | no | no | yes |
| Says so when it does not know | yes | not applicable | no | yes |
| Scales without adding people | no | yes | yes | yes |
The first three make a human do the reasoning, or invent it. CertProve computes an answer a human can audit.
Row five: a good consultant says when they do not know, a general model does not.
When not to buy this
Three cases where the honest answer is no, said here rather than in the third call
One programme, nearly finished, nothing will change again
The value is in the change, and you have run out of changes
You want someone to make the compliance decisions
That is a consultancy. We keep the evidence, you keep the judgement
Your certification basis is not written down anywhere yet
Start with the Slice Audit, not a licence
