Specialised workflows on one foundation
Every technical team designs, analyses and verifies in depth, on the same living model, under aerospace-grade access control
Ten disciplines, station by station
Each discipline gets its own area, locked by default, contributing to one whole, the integration nobody else has
Systems engineering
Functions, architecture and budgets on the model every other discipline derives from
Powertrain
Electric, hydrogen fuel-cell, hybrid and distributed-electric packs, each with failure physics and clauses
Avionics
The aircraft systems from ATA 21 to 57, hazards derived from components and connections
Structures
Fuselage, doors, windows, pylon and empennage on the same connected graph
Software · DO-178C
Software items tracing to the requirement they implement, at the DAL the requirement demands
Hardware · DO-254
Complex hardware with DAL flow-down checked against ARP4754B, assurance never silently reduced
Safety
The full ARP4761A chain, FHA to SSA, graded against the 25.1309 ceiling
Verification & flight test
Ground and flight campaigns, every run tracing back to the requirement it closes
Certification & review
The basis, means of compliance and the authority review, in place, not over email
Quality & configuration
NCR, FRACAS, change and problem records, linked to the artefacts they act on
Specialist depth, shared structure
A powertrain engineer never edits a stress case, yet both work the same aircraft, and the model carries each result to everyone downstream
Every discipline in the same window
Systems, hardware and safety working the same artefacts at the same moment, every edit attributed, nothing merged later
A change in one discipline ripples to every other
Because the graph is the structure
Not a maintained link
