Skip to content

Specialised workflows on one foundation

Every technical team designs, analyses and verifies in depth, on the same living model, under aerospace-grade access control

Ten disciplines, station by station

Each discipline gets its own area, locked by default, contributing to one whole, the integration nobody else has

SYS01 / 10

Systems engineering

Functions, architecture and budgets on the model every other discipline derives from

PWR02 / 10

Powertrain

Battery electric, hybrid, hydrogen fuel-cell and distributed-electric packs, each with failure physics and clauses

AVI03 / 10

Avionics

The aircraft systems from ATA 21 to 57, hazards derived from components and connections

STR04 / 10

Structures

Fuselage, doors, windows, pylon and empennage on the same connected graph

SW05 / 10

Software · DO-178C

Software items tracing to the requirement they implement, at the DAL the requirement demands

HW06 / 10

Hardware · DO-254

Complex hardware with DAL flow-down checked against ARP4754B, assurance never silently reduced

SAFE07 / 10

Safety

The full ARP4761A chain, FHA to SSA, graded against the 25.1309 ceiling

V&V08 / 10

Verification & flight test

Ground and flight campaigns, every run tracing back to the requirement it closes

CERT09 / 10

Certification & review

The basis, means of compliance and the authority review, in place, not over email

QA10 / 10

Quality & configuration

NCR, FRACAS, change and problem records, linked to the artefacts they act on

Specialist depth, shared structure

A powertrain engineer never edits a stress case, yet both work the same aircraft, and the model carries each result to everyone downstream

Every discipline in the same window

Systems, hardware and safety working the same artefacts at the same moment, every edit attributed, nothing merged later

CERTPROVE / AV-01 / OVERVIEW
Find anything⌘K
SMD
LIVE
Model
Overview
Requirements
Architecture
Prove
Trace
Lattice
Gaps
Safety
FHA
FTA
Margins
Deliver
Test
Docs
Evidence
Work
Engineering lead

Overview

SystemsHardwareSoftwareSafetyTest
Systems model
SYS-REQ-104
Primary flight control actuation shall have triple redundant power
DAL AVERIFIED
SYS-REQ-105
Cross-tie contactor opens automatically on a bus short
DAL AFAILED
Alice (systems)
Hardware BOM
P/N 99-882-11
Actuator servo motor
P/N 99-882-14
Power distribution unit
Bob (hardware)
Safety
FHA-001CAT
Total loss of thrust on both motors
Sarah (safety)
REV CBASIS SC-VTOL214 NODES · 337 EDGES SYNCED

Novel programmes first

Battery electric eVTOL and advanced air mobility, hybrid propulsion, hydrogen, UAS and defence, and conventional Part 23 and Part 25 programmes, worldwide

Footage NASA Ames Research Center · multirotor test bed in the wind tunnel, 2019

Unmanned aircraft under the European rule

Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 is the basic regulation. Two acts under it govern the drone, one the operation and one the product, and the operation falls into three categories by risk

Low risk, no prior authorisation

Within the limits of subcategories A1, A2 and A3, flown in visual line of sight and below 120 metres

Where the open limits no longer hold

An authorisation on an Article 11 risk assessment, a declaration under a published standard scenario, or a light UAS operator certificate to authorise your own operations

The aircraft, the operator and the pilot

Where the risk is such that the aircraft is certified, the operator is certified and the remote pilot is licensed, in the manner of a manned aircraft

The product carries its class, the programme carries its record

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 governs the drone as a product. CertProve records the programme against all three regulations by article

open category
C0C1C2C3C4
standard scenarios
C5C6
CEPlaced on the market with a CE marking and a class identification label, and the manufacturer's technical documentation shows how the aircraft meets its class
manufacturerimporterdistributoreach answer for their part
how the programme is recorded
2018/1139The basic regulation, cited by article
2019/947The operation: UAS.OPEN, UAS.SPEC and the standard scenarios, cited to the point
2019/945The product: the class requirements and the technical documentation, cited by article and Part
Article 11The risk assessment written to the SORA, the acceptable means EASA publishes, annex by annex
14 CFR 21.17(b)The FAA publishes no airworthiness code for a drone: a special class on criteria issued per type. The product says so instead of inventing a part number
01
Know the category before the authority asks
The programme records which category the operation sits in and which points of the rule follow from it, so the application is written to the right one from the first day
02
The authorisation application is the record
The risk assessment is written to the SORA step by step, each step on its annex, with the operations manual and technical documentation owed beside it
03
A class label with the documentation behind it
The technical documentation is assembled from the programme's own evidence, frozen and hashed, and travels to a second market unrewritten
Drone Strategy 2.0Adopted by the European Commission in 2022: its vision for drone services in the Union, including the U-space framework for the airspace they will share
Alliance for Zero-Emission AviationConvened by the Commission in 2022 for organisations working towards hydrogen-powered and electric aircraft. Membership is open to those that sign its declaration
Context lines: European Commission, Directorate-General for Defence Industry and Space, CC BY 4.0. Regulation texts: EUR-Lex, © European Union. CertProve is independent and implies no endorsement

A change in one discipline ripples to every other

Because the graph is the structure

Not a maintained link

Bring your discipline onto the graph

Access is granted on request while the platform is in early release