Skip to content

Cleared to fly, on the authority’s terms

MIL-HDBK-516C decides whether a US military air system is airworthy. CertProve turns your own design data into the compliance record and the safety case that answer it

What this regime costs you today

Every criterion is answered, tailored with a reason, or open. There is no fourth state, and the record never invents one.

Your tailored criteria set is the contract

Agreed once, lived with for years. What you tailored out is as load bearing as what you kept.

The evidence is tracked by hand

Hundreds of criteria in spreadsheets, re-checked by people every time the design moves.

A claim is not a showing

The authority asks what stands behind it. Nothing behind it is a finding, and findings hold the clearance.

Every change reopens the argument

A new store, a new sensor, a new software load, and a team rediscovers what it touched.

Whatever you fly, it has to be proven

One handbook reaches the whole air system, from the airframe to what hangs off it

  • Fighter
  • Bomber
  • Airlifter
  • Tanker
  • Attack rotorcraft
  • Tiltrotor
  • Collaborative combat
  • Long endurance
  • Hypersonic
  • Air launched stores

What changes when the evidence derives itself

Adopting the criteria

todaytyped from the handbook into a matrix, one at a time
hereproposed from the handbook and diffed against what your programme already holds

Answering them

todaya person restates each criterion in a template
herethe compliance record renders from your data, criterion by criterion

Pricing a change

todaya working group rediscovers what the change touched
heredeclare it against the frozen baseline and read back what it reopens

Handing over the pack

todaya folder, and the gaps found by the reviewer
hereevery claim carries its showing, and the gaps are named before they are found

What we stand on, and what we will never do

we stand on
MIL-HDBK-516Cthe airworthiness criteria as published, not a summary of them
MIL-STD-882Ethe system safety process your programme plan and hazard analyses answer to
Your tailoringrecorded with its reason and its review item, so it survives a change of team
Your own programmethe records derive from your data and say plainly when something is missing
we will never
Approve anythingthe authority decides. We assemble the evidence and sign nothing.
Invent a citationwhere a standard is not held it is named, never quoted from memory.
Score you out of tenno coverage figure, because certification is not a percentage.
Move your datasingle tenant inside your own boundary, markings on every export.
Check us on itPick an air system and read every record this composes, set-asides and all

Bring a change you have already been through

Bring a change you have already certified. Six weeks on your own baseline, and you keep the report either way

your own baselinesix weeksevery engineyou keep the report either way